Birdwatch Note
2024-11-04 00:52:49 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
The only issue with the post is that the account isn’t what it says it is. While the account should be reported, NNN.
Written by 5BE6684450B68A701B8214A1A623393C2B2F02E645C3B0C119AC5D619CF735FE
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1853085116144464109
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1853238939810664792
- noteId - 1853238939810664792
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 5BE6684450B68A701B8214A1A623393C2B2F02E645C3B0C119AC5D619CF735FE
- createdAtMillis - 1730681569422
- tweetId - 1853085116144464109
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- The only issue with the post is that the account isn’t what it says it is. While the account should be reported, NNN.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-11-03 20:56:24 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-03 19:19:36 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-03 20:34:08 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-03 19:07:03 -0600 | Rating Details |