Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-11-03 15:25:41 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN - The claim is factual. Not liking it and posting a counter belongs in comments, not CN.

Written by 3BC91D4EDF9CCC706F84DA49D9BEE1FBD7F0CFD1C0BAB10F950C6218CC6BA413
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1853065874657165754

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1853096215195406369
  • noteId - 1853096215195406369
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 3BC91D4EDF9CCC706F84DA49D9BEE1FBD7F0CFD1C0BAB10F950C6218CC6BA413
  • createdAtMillis - 1730647541222
  • tweetId - 1853065874657165754
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 1
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • NNN - The claim is factual. Not liking it and posting a counter belongs in comments, not CN.

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-11-03 10:58:03 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-03 10:50:47 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-03 09:37:27 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-03 09:29:36 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-03 09:27:56 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-03 09:45:13 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-03 09:28:44 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-03 09:41:04 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-03 09:29:33 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-03 09:26:49 -0600 Rating Details