Birdwatch Note
2024-11-03 14:45:17 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN - The OP is clearly expressing an opinion regarding the judicial outcome. CN should be expressed as a comment.
Written by 0693CFC4EBA580D29505D7A490B40A21821F0A04180169534BC5F0FA52BE31C5
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1853024292633444509
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1853086048361857103
- noteId - 1853086048361857103
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 0693CFC4EBA580D29505D7A490B40A21821F0A04180169534BC5F0FA52BE31C5
- createdAtMillis - 1730645117261
- tweetId - 1853024292633444509
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN - The OP is clearly expressing an opinion regarding the judicial outcome. CN should be expressed as a comment.
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2024-11-04 11:54:27 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-11-03 19:03:18 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-11-03 13:02:32 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-11-03 12:09:14 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-11-06 17:08:55 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-11-04 03:39:00 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-11-03 09:05:16 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-11-04 03:51:19 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-11-03 10:31:43 -0600 | Rating Details |