Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-11-01 20:50:43 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Yes, 153rd. https://x.com/PopBase/status/1852447793539092852

Written by D204191A3A9B36E74FD527D58B8D9F0774ADA2F5604862896F11ED58D559478A
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1852447927806902406

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1852453236474618063
  • noteId - 1852453236474618063
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - D204191A3A9B36E74FD527D58B8D9F0774ADA2F5604862896F11ED58D559478A
  • createdAtMillis - 1730494243149
  • tweetId - 1852447927806902406
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Yes, 153rd. https://x.com/PopBase/status/1852447793539092852

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-11-02 20:06:39 -0500 Rating Details
2024-11-01 19:16:22 -0500 Rating Details
2024-11-02 04:25:54 -0500 Rating Details