Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-10-28 16:20:09 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The original post is correct. In 2021, the UK’s High Court ordered Yaxley-Lennon to cease promoting libellous (i.e. false) allegations about a teenage Syrian refugee after the teenager successfully sued him for libel. https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Hijazi-v-Yaxley-Lennon-judgment-220721.pdf

Written by B988F33D022E556A16CC2BCC7308B3C2A58E946929EBDABEFE209411563026E5
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1850885567023583293

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1850935595306221805
  • noteId - 1850935595306221805
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - B988F33D022E556A16CC2BCC7308B3C2A58E946929EBDABEFE209411563026E5
  • createdAtMillis - 1730132409299
  • tweetId - 1850885567023583293
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The original post is correct. In 2021, the UK’s High Court ordered Yaxley-Lennon to cease promoting libellous (i.e. false) allegations about a teenage Syrian refugee after the teenager successfully sued him for libel. https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Hijazi-v-Yaxley-Lennon-judgment-220721.pdf

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-10-29 14:27:08 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-29 03:06:15 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-28 15:15:57 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-28 14:13:26 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-28 13:07:28 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-28 12:14:01 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-28 11:22:19 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-28 21:16:53 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-28 13:31:26 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-28 13:08:13 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-28 12:08:43 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-28 11:32:10 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-28 11:31:07 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-29 03:05:58 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-28 18:00:48 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-28 17:20:14 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-28 13:49:54 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-28 13:23:20 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-28 12:29:31 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-28 12:21:54 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-28 12:18:12 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-28 11:43:00 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-28 11:37:01 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-28 11:21:04 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-28 13:26:00 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-28 12:58:53 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-28 12:45:37 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-28 12:26:32 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-28 12:13:09 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-28 11:42:56 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-30 15:18:14 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-29 06:23:20 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-28 14:02:09 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-28 13:41:39 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-28 12:22:54 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-28 11:30:38 -0500 Rating Details