Birdwatch Note
2024-10-25 09:55:10 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
Why have you bothered to make a CN on this when it just needs to a reply to the originator.
Written by 3386D9A7E0C64BBED90C38EA0CC191E467119FE6D0B31C78052B07C9BE0BE52D
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1849430781677932691
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1849751547061629140
- noteId - 1849751547061629140
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 3386D9A7E0C64BBED90C38EA0CC191E467119FE6D0B31C78052B07C9BE0BE52D
- createdAtMillis - 1729850110198
- tweetId - 1849430781677932691
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Why have you bothered to make a CN on this when it just needs to a reply to the originator.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-10-25 07:26:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-25 16:56:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-30 00:34:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-25 07:19:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-25 15:21:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-25 23:58:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-25 12:51:23 -0500 | Rating Details |