Birdwatch Note
2024-10-22 00:24:50 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Based on the current scientific evidence, there is no compelling evidence linking 5G to cancer in humans. The levels of radiation from 5G are well within safe limits, and extensive research has not linked 5G to any adverse health effects. https://www.forbes.com/health/wellness/is-5g-safe/ https://www.visaliatimesdelta.com/story/news/2020/04/04/fact-check-no-5-g-wireless-towers-arent-dangerous/2941154001/ https://www.fda.gov/radiation-emitting-products/cell-phones/scientific-evidence-cell-phone-safety https://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/is-5g-dangerous/ https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/radiation-5g-mobile-networks-and-health https://www.visaliatimesdelta.com/story/news/2020/04/04/fact-check-no-5-g-wireless-towers-arent-dangerous/2941154001/ https://www.cancer.org/cancer/risk-prevention/radiation-exposure/cellular-phone-towers.html https://factcheck.afp.com/no-evidence-5g-radiation-harmful-human-health-experts-say
Written by 2A6B630D0AEA2ACC36E2189A989B042C8F44788D5C6526EF4EAC8856A79A73D8
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1848484465510609093
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1848520856093524074
- noteId - 1848520856093524074
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 2A6B630D0AEA2ACC36E2189A989B042C8F44788D5C6526EF4EAC8856A79A73D8
- createdAtMillis - 1729556690607
- tweetId - 1848484465510609093
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Based on the current scientific evidence, there is no compelling evidence linking 5G to cancer in humans. The levels of radiation from 5G are well within safe limits, and extensive research has not linked 5G to any adverse health effects. https://www.forbes.com/health/wellness/is-5g-safe/ https://www.visaliatimesdelta.com/story/news/2020/04/04/fact-check-no-5-g-wireless-towers-arent-dangerous/2941154001/ https://www.fda.gov/radiation-emitting-products/cell-phones/scientific-evidence-cell-phone-safety https://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/is-5g-dangerous/ https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/radiation-5g-mobile-networks-and-health https://www.visaliatimesdelta.com/story/news/2020/04/04/fact-check-no-5-g-wireless-towers-arent-dangerous/2941154001/ https://www.cancer.org/cancer/risk-prevention/radiation-exposure/cellular-phone-towers.html https://factcheck.afp.com/no-evidence-5g-radiation-harmful-human-health-experts-say
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-10-22 06:00:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-21 20:33:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-21 19:37:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-21 19:35:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-22 05:52:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-21 20:43:13 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-21 21:58:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-21 21:27:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-21 20:50:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-21 19:31:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-21 21:50:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-21 19:31:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-21 19:25:49 -0500 | Rating Details |