Birdwatch Note
2024-10-17 13:51:47 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN. It is clear these are betting odds which are more reliable than polls anyway.
Written by DAAB78B9E64E2FA58C57C7590BE22DA3D51DD7B3AB2254AA2D90BA501A23902D
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1846219853675233422
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1846911991325380640
- noteId - 1846911991325380640
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - DAAB78B9E64E2FA58C57C7590BE22DA3D51DD7B3AB2254AA2D90BA501A23902D
- createdAtMillis - 1729173107354
- tweetId - 1846219853675233422
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN. It is clear these are betting odds which are more reliable than polls anyway.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-10-17 11:58:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-17 10:26:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-17 10:13:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-17 13:36:44 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-21 19:43:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-18 05:39:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-17 12:42:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-17 09:39:13 -0500 | Rating Details |