Birdwatch Note
2024-10-02 15:49:27 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
The OP's source article includes the poll summary in the first paragraph, which clearly shows a 51/49 split. CNN's graphic is accurate of their own polling. Opinions as to who won the debate should be offered in the replies to this post and not Community Notes. https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/02/politics/election-poll-walz-vance-debate/index.html
Written by 1E4195F97B220CC02243022593DA968F54F0782A10EB2F3CC8F478BA6C6586CB
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1841331032382967958
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1841505783760007182
- noteId - 1841505783760007182
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 1E4195F97B220CC02243022593DA968F54F0782A10EB2F3CC8F478BA6C6586CB
- createdAtMillis - 1727884167028
- tweetId - 1841331032382967958
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The OP's source article includes the poll summary in the first paragraph, which clearly shows a 51/49 split. CNN's graphic is accurate of their own polling. Opinions as to who won the debate should be offered in the replies to this post and not Community Notes. https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/02/politics/election-poll-walz-vance-debate/index.html
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-10-02 18:22:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-02 17:46:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-02 16:32:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-02 15:57:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-02 15:01:29 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-02 14:12:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-02 11:59:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-03 10:52:29 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-02 22:09:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-02 21:52:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-02 21:17:49 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-02 19:58:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-02 11:59:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-02 20:40:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-02 16:49:28 -0500 | Rating Details |