Birdwatch Note
2024-10-02 00:49:01 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN - The original poster clearly states this is his opinion and thesis. This discussion belongs in the replies, not in abusing Community Notes.
Written by 0A91A111A69CBC0986E82668BF204636CB0E72C276306BE2E5AD4AF0C26462FD
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1840913681510777283
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1841279185194533192
- noteId - 1841279185194533192
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 0A91A111A69CBC0986E82668BF204636CB0E72C276306BE2E5AD4AF0C26462FD
- createdAtMillis - 1727830141719
- tweetId - 1840913681510777283
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN - The original poster clearly states this is his opinion and thesis. This discussion belongs in the replies, not in abusing Community Notes.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-10-02 09:08:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-01 21:45:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-01 19:52:56 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-01 19:53:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-01 19:55:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-17 08:36:06 -0500 | Rating Details |