Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-09-29 22:35:07 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Nexrad radars CANNOT repel air masses which weigh billions of pounds, especially operating at only 750kW for 7 sec/hr. There is no evidence of conductive nanoparticle seeding. Shown is anomalous propagation or radar bloom cause by superrefraction of the beam. https://medium.com/weather-wisdom/radar-beams-refraction-inversions-and-ground-clutter-4b7dec0df821 https://www.noaa.gov/jetstream/radar-beams https://www.accuweather.com/en/weather-blogs/weathermatrix/anomalies-radar-bloom-ducting-explained/99303 https://www.roc.noaa.gov/public-documents/operations-branch/Data_Quality_Oddities_and_Anomalies.pdf https://www.theweatherprediction.com/habyhints2/391/ https://www.ametsoc.org/amsedu/Anim/img_loops/LargeRad/index.html#:~:text=For%20example%2C%20a%20strong%20temperature,stronger%2C%20and%20grainier%20in%20appearance https://courses.comet.ucar.edu/pluginfile.php/3704/mod_imscp/content/1/anomalous_propagation.html

Written by 55AC18E8A73A60B03F155142ADCD2F6B879BF7CEC30247F69D1997B3D4018EAE
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1840482789327876328

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1840520711951065590
  • noteId - 1840520711951065590
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 55AC18E8A73A60B03F155142ADCD2F6B879BF7CEC30247F69D1997B3D4018EAE
  • createdAtMillis - 1727649307607
  • tweetId - 1840482789327876328
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Nexrad radars CANNOT repel air masses which weigh billions of pounds, especially operating at only 750kW for 7 sec/hr. There is no evidence of conductive nanoparticle seeding. Shown is anomalous propagation or radar bloom cause by superrefraction of the beam. https://medium.com/weather-wisdom/radar-beams-refraction-inversions-and-ground-clutter-4b7dec0df821 https://www.noaa.gov/jetstream/radar-beams https://www.accuweather.com/en/weather-blogs/weathermatrix/anomalies-radar-bloom-ducting-explained/99303 https://www.roc.noaa.gov/public-documents/operations-branch/Data_Quality_Oddities_and_Anomalies.pdf https://www.theweatherprediction.com/habyhints2/391/ https://www.ametsoc.org/amsedu/Anim/img_loops/LargeRad/index.html#:~:text=For%20example%2C%20a%20strong%20temperature,stronger%2C%20and%20grainier%20in%20appearance https://courses.comet.ucar.edu/pluginfile.php/3704/mod_imscp/content/1/anomalous_propagation.html

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-09-29 22:10:00 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-01 22:38:46 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-15 11:21:47 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-25 14:37:12 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-25 07:51:13 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-08 10:46:13 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-08 01:23:49 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-21 15:27:35 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-09 12:40:01 -0500 Rating Details