Birdwatch Note
2024-09-29 22:35:07 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Nexrad radars CANNOT repel air masses which weigh billions of pounds, especially operating at only 750kW for 7 sec/hr. There is no evidence of conductive nanoparticle seeding. Shown is anomalous propagation or radar bloom cause by superrefraction of the beam. https://medium.com/weather-wisdom/radar-beams-refraction-inversions-and-ground-clutter-4b7dec0df821 https://www.noaa.gov/jetstream/radar-beams https://www.accuweather.com/en/weather-blogs/weathermatrix/anomalies-radar-bloom-ducting-explained/99303 https://www.roc.noaa.gov/public-documents/operations-branch/Data_Quality_Oddities_and_Anomalies.pdf https://www.theweatherprediction.com/habyhints2/391/ https://www.ametsoc.org/amsedu/Anim/img_loops/LargeRad/index.html#:~:text=For%20example%2C%20a%20strong%20temperature,stronger%2C%20and%20grainier%20in%20appearance https://courses.comet.ucar.edu/pluginfile.php/3704/mod_imscp/content/1/anomalous_propagation.html
Written by 55AC18E8A73A60B03F155142ADCD2F6B879BF7CEC30247F69D1997B3D4018EAE
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1840482789327876328
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1840520711951065590
- noteId - 1840520711951065590
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 55AC18E8A73A60B03F155142ADCD2F6B879BF7CEC30247F69D1997B3D4018EAE
- createdAtMillis - 1727649307607
- tweetId - 1840482789327876328
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Nexrad radars CANNOT repel air masses which weigh billions of pounds, especially operating at only 750kW for 7 sec/hr. There is no evidence of conductive nanoparticle seeding. Shown is anomalous propagation or radar bloom cause by superrefraction of the beam. https://medium.com/weather-wisdom/radar-beams-refraction-inversions-and-ground-clutter-4b7dec0df821 https://www.noaa.gov/jetstream/radar-beams https://www.accuweather.com/en/weather-blogs/weathermatrix/anomalies-radar-bloom-ducting-explained/99303 https://www.roc.noaa.gov/public-documents/operations-branch/Data_Quality_Oddities_and_Anomalies.pdf https://www.theweatherprediction.com/habyhints2/391/ https://www.ametsoc.org/amsedu/Anim/img_loops/LargeRad/index.html#:~:text=For%20example%2C%20a%20strong%20temperature,stronger%2C%20and%20grainier%20in%20appearance https://courses.comet.ucar.edu/pluginfile.php/3704/mod_imscp/content/1/anomalous_propagation.html
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2024-09-29 22:10:00 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-01 22:38:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-15 11:21:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-25 14:37:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-25 07:51:13 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-08 10:46:13 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-08 01:23:49 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-21 15:27:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-09 12:40:01 -0500 | Rating Details |