Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-09-22 17:16:18 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

As explained in this post, the editors note says nothing about a Part 2. This user is spreading misinformation. https://x.com/WSJ_manga/status/1837770055032914223?t=MNIhZ_lamRNHvmTG4v0YKw&s=19

Written by E4570C5ABAF852D1E632688B68AC848167E57D01C24FBC714D582922C8502171
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1837485243017609708

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1837903763421761624
  • noteId - 1837903763421761624
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - E4570C5ABAF852D1E632688B68AC848167E57D01C24FBC714D582922C8502171
  • createdAtMillis - 1727025378459
  • tweetId - 1837485243017609708
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 1
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • As explained in this post, the editors note says nothing about a Part 2. This user is spreading misinformation. https://x.com/WSJ_manga/status/1837770055032914223?t=MNIhZ_lamRNHvmTG4v0YKw&s=19

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-09-22 13:07:17 -0500 Rating Details