Birdwatch Note
2024-09-22 17:16:18 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
As explained in this post, the editors note says nothing about a Part 2. This user is spreading misinformation. https://x.com/WSJ_manga/status/1837770055032914223?t=MNIhZ_lamRNHvmTG4v0YKw&s=19
Written by E4570C5ABAF852D1E632688B68AC848167E57D01C24FBC714D582922C8502171
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1837485243017609708
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1837903763421761624
- noteId - 1837903763421761624
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - E4570C5ABAF852D1E632688B68AC848167E57D01C24FBC714D582922C8502171
- createdAtMillis - 1727025378459
- tweetId - 1837485243017609708
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 1
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- As explained in this post, the editors note says nothing about a Part 2. This user is spreading misinformation. https://x.com/WSJ_manga/status/1837770055032914223?t=MNIhZ_lamRNHvmTG4v0YKw&s=19
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2024-09-22 13:07:17 -0500 | Rating Details |