Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-09-21 05:16:25 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

This is a clear contempt of court. EVMs have been given clean chit by the supreme court after proper investigation. https://www.aajtak.in/india/news/story/supreme-court-null-vvpat-evm-petition-election-commission-ntc-1929244-2024-04-26 This is a clear example of creatinf disbelief of people in the highest institution of the Indian judiciary.

Written by 86860BA7CA6BFFFC6FF3388426ECA361B2328B735F18781326CD573D6EB14E6F
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1837189455406399690

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1837360213151645738
  • noteId - 1837360213151645738
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 86860BA7CA6BFFFC6FF3388426ECA361B2328B735F18781326CD573D6EB14E6F
  • createdAtMillis - 1726895785974
  • tweetId - 1837189455406399690
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 1
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • This is a clear contempt of court. EVMs have been given clean chit by the supreme court after proper investigation. https://www.aajtak.in/india/news/story/supreme-court-null-vvpat-evm-petition-election-commission-ntc-1929244-2024-04-26 This is a clear example of creatinf disbelief of people in the highest institution of the Indian judiciary.

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-09-21 20:13:50 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-21 12:46:42 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-21 11:50:40 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-21 11:38:18 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-21 11:21:57 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-21 11:14:50 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-21 11:00:28 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-21 10:53:24 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-21 10:39:45 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-21 10:38:30 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-21 10:32:02 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-21 10:31:14 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-21 09:52:01 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-21 09:49:32 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-21 09:05:29 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-21 08:56:47 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-21 08:54:19 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-21 08:34:25 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-21 08:07:17 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-21 07:30:46 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-21 07:03:08 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-21 06:46:39 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-21 05:50:35 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-21 05:45:13 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-21 04:56:41 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-21 01:47:28 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-21 01:36:59 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-21 01:18:15 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-21 01:00:45 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-21 00:53:23 -0500 Rating Details