Birdwatch Note
2024-09-21 02:25:08 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
There was no evidence that the 2020 US election was riddled with fraud. https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.2103619118
Written by 1818F96C4AABFDB339A9DC838D6BA2F28B380DD84BE9DA77B80DD080299A8C19
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1837269925611852154
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1837317104846131471
- noteId - 1837317104846131471
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 1818F96C4AABFDB339A9DC838D6BA2F28B380DD84BE9DA77B80DD080299A8C19
- createdAtMillis - 1726885508153
- tweetId - 1837269925611852154
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- There was no evidence that the 2020 US election was riddled with fraud. https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.2103619118
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-09-21 16:54:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-09-21 06:57:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-09-21 00:22:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-09-20 23:25:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-09-20 22:49:11 -0500 | Rating Details |