Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-08-17 02:28:34 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The Department of Education sought to remove an injunction against the new Title IX rules or to sever some provisons from the rest so they could be immediately enacted. SCOTUS denied the petition. The cases continue in the lower courts, with the injunctions in place. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/24a78_f2ah.pdf

Written by 7BEDBE2DC479EC8CEDFF92E72982275807E1B4B2A2DCB8C6A9FBD9581FBA8FDB
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1824582555154235643

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1824634396919599422
  • noteId - 1824634396919599422
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 7BEDBE2DC479EC8CEDFF92E72982275807E1B4B2A2DCB8C6A9FBD9581FBA8FDB
  • createdAtMillis - 1723861714949
  • tweetId - 1824582555154235643
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The Department of Education sought to remove an injunction against the new Title IX rules or to sever some provisons from the rest so they could be immediately enacted. SCOTUS denied the petition. The cases continue in the lower courts, with the injunctions in place. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/24a78_f2ah.pdf

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-08-17 16:12:49 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-17 15:50:35 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-17 11:08:55 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-17 09:53:36 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-17 09:52:43 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-17 08:45:57 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-17 08:26:06 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-17 07:25:51 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-17 06:57:05 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-17 05:22:18 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-17 04:25:01 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-17 03:05:08 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-17 02:33:51 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-17 00:34:07 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-17 00:17:33 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-16 23:57:21 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-16 23:55:04 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-16 23:09:36 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-16 22:55:45 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-16 22:54:13 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-16 22:43:36 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-16 22:41:21 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-16 22:30:54 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-16 22:09:13 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-16 21:54:44 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-16 21:52:06 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-16 21:50:54 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-16 21:49:59 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-16 21:45:22 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-27 17:30:51 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-17 17:39:50 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-17 10:54:22 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-17 09:10:43 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-17 08:55:50 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-17 04:39:38 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-17 04:37:56 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-17 03:25:56 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-17 02:45:26 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-17 01:17:12 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-16 23:13:06 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-16 22:46:52 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-16 21:46:59 -0500 Rating Details