Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-08-16 20:49:29 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

We are indeed helpful. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_Notes

Written by 40A1C693105930D6212A2947E39B98DA1E72B0139D18E7078C679CE6DCCCA962
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1824495603143020906

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1824549060088566204
  • noteId - 1824549060088566204
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 40A1C693105930D6212A2947E39B98DA1E72B0139D18E7078C679CE6DCCCA962
  • createdAtMillis - 1723841369065
  • tweetId - 1824495603143020906
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 1
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • We are indeed helpful. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_Notes

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-08-17 10:33:02 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-17 06:01:19 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-17 03:27:01 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-16 17:27:39 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-16 17:20:38 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-16 16:21:51 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-16 17:41:28 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-16 17:03:30 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-16 15:57:04 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-16 15:52:05 -0500 Rating Details