Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-08-16 05:27:01 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN the proposed CN regarding the source of the picture is not worthy of being posted as a CN, source of the picture is not germane to the subject of the post.

Written by D59B9480AF07229D44F016E058EB41122618747DA2B05F0C28CB51927547BE95
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1824070637540798930

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1824316916493902104
  • noteId - 1824316916493902104
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - D59B9480AF07229D44F016E058EB41122618747DA2B05F0C28CB51927547BE95
  • createdAtMillis - 1723786021720
  • tweetId - 1824070637540798930
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 1
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • NNN the proposed CN regarding the source of the picture is not worthy of being posted as a CN, source of the picture is not germane to the subject of the post.

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-08-16 03:11:02 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-16 02:45:19 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-16 01:49:37 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-16 01:33:30 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-16 03:25:21 -0500 Rating Details