Birdwatch Note
2024-08-14 23:52:49 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Engagement farming. Connecting a 3D bust of a celebrity to an alleged rendering of a religious figure has become more and more common. This is not a model of what Moses would have looked like. It is clearly a digitally rendered image of famed wrestler Hulk Hogan. https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/3d-recreation-moses-hulk-hogan/
Written by DB15313C16D92F46CE2D96738E636DE6165877F6A28F61D246EC893AAA97BA7B
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1823800617594163462
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1823870421961425309
- noteId - 1823870421961425309
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - DB15313C16D92F46CE2D96738E636DE6165877F6A28F61D246EC893AAA97BA7B
- createdAtMillis - 1723679569126
- tweetId - 1823800617594163462
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 1
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Engagement farming. Connecting a 3D bust of a celebrity to an alleged rendering of a religious figure has become more and more common. This is not a model of what Moses would have looked like. It is clearly a digitally rendered image of famed wrestler Hulk Hogan. https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/3d-recreation-moses-hulk-hogan/
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2024-08-15 17:31:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-15 15:39:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-15 15:22:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-15 15:04:56 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-15 13:13:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-15 13:06:31 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-15 10:58:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-15 10:55:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-15 10:22:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-15 09:30:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-15 09:06:31 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-15 07:48:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-15 07:37:29 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-15 06:34:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-15 03:56:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-15 01:46:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-15 00:32:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-14 22:39:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-14 22:08:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-14 21:57:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-14 21:23:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-14 20:51:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-14 20:45:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-14 20:36:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-15 11:33:38 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-15 08:58:44 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-15 01:50:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-15 00:53:46 -0500 | Rating Details |