Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-08-14 17:55:34 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The class action suit Andersen v Stability Ai is based on artists defending work they own from Generative Ai companies illicit use of said work. Fan art is not a subject of the case. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/artists-score-major-win-copyright-case-against-ai-art-generators-1235973601/ Furthermore rights of works fan art is based off are owned by authors and/or corporations https://lawsoup.org/legal-guides/copyright-protecting-creative-artistic-business-work/fan-art/

Written by FBA07E0FCD2EDD3202698B9215493D3E580AECBE45BDF81154DFCEBFD164CAC5
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1823496565408903555

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1823780520549081156
  • noteId - 1823780520549081156
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - FBA07E0FCD2EDD3202698B9215493D3E580AECBE45BDF81154DFCEBFD164CAC5
  • createdAtMillis - 1723658134960
  • tweetId - 1823496565408903555
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The class action suit Andersen v Stability Ai is based on artists defending work they own from Generative Ai companies illicit use of said work. Fan art is not a subject of the case. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/artists-score-major-win-copyright-case-against-ai-art-generators-1235973601/ Furthermore rights of works fan art is based off are owned by authors and/or corporations https://lawsoup.org/legal-guides/copyright-protecting-creative-artistic-business-work/fan-art/

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-08-15 21:03:45 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-15 19:17:29 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-15 16:10:14 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-15 16:03:47 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-15 13:36:13 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-15 13:33:33 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-15 11:13:25 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-15 08:24:49 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-15 08:22:09 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-15 08:04:00 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-15 05:03:27 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-15 00:48:45 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-15 00:40:21 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-14 20:19:51 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-14 18:08:58 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-14 16:14:20 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-14 14:42:25 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-14 14:36:52 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-14 14:26:37 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-14 14:22:57 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-14 14:06:39 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-14 13:52:15 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-15 15:53:50 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-15 12:20:59 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-15 11:40:12 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-15 09:51:07 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-15 09:46:45 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-14 13:16:10 -0500 Rating Details