Birdwatch Note
2024-08-14 16:17:26 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN - plenty of evidence in OP’s linked article to explain how and why The Guardian is no longer fully independent of UK security services influence.
Written by 5365B6A74630E0C11D841B0AF8CBEBFA859BF6454AD854B5AD5973FE631A5DD5
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1823345805962416360
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1823755823073378809
- noteId - 1823755823073378809
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 5365B6A74630E0C11D841B0AF8CBEBFA859BF6454AD854B5AD5973FE631A5DD5
- createdAtMillis - 1723652246623
- tweetId - 1823345805962416360
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- NNN - plenty of evidence in OP’s linked article to explain how and why The Guardian is no longer fully independent of UK security services influence.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-08-15 02:18:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-15 02:12:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-14 16:50:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-14 16:19:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-15 07:37:22 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-07 03:07:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-29 14:51:20 -0500 | Rating Details |