Birdwatch Note
2024-08-14 16:03:23 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN - the post clearly says that this is not Raygun
Written by 030F3DE6ED7B3233E13F2BBF83638BFF5F63CA687061526FCD8804471EC3DD82
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1823434189972361588
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1823752287178707343
- noteId - 1823752287178707343
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 030F3DE6ED7B3233E13F2BBF83638BFF5F63CA687061526FCD8804471EC3DD82
- createdAtMillis - 1723651403601
- tweetId - 1823434189972361588
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 1
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- NNN - the post clearly says that this is not Raygun
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-08-15 17:45:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-14 14:02:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-14 13:43:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-14 12:22:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-14 11:56:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-14 11:27:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-14 11:26:38 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-14 11:06:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-14 11:34:51 -0500 | Rating Details |