Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-08-11 10:12:31 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN - post is clearly an opinion (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion), put your thoughts about this post down in the replies, NOT in the notes

Written by B0E81956A22188462481428BCD19D7200731233ADAE48B4CE6FB6E0AF12317E2
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1822084994250178888

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1822576824439763277
  • noteId - 1822576824439763277
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - B0E81956A22188462481428BCD19D7200731233ADAE48B4CE6FB6E0AF12317E2
  • createdAtMillis - 1723371151444
  • tweetId - 1822084994250178888
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • NNN - post is clearly an opinion (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion), put your thoughts about this post down in the replies, NOT in the notes

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-08-11 21:25:38 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-11 17:59:12 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-11 12:00:13 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-11 20:07:43 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-11 15:11:40 -0500 Rating Details