Birdwatch Note
2024-08-11 04:41:11 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Sincerity comes from a place of true intention and is not predicated on a quid pro quo arrangement. A sincere apology would have included deleting the original tweet, not requiring Mr. Smith to delete his post first. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sincerity
Written by A6BB5D887B470284DD2170F3149BA29EE8870F751AE9F243A8ABFD82E74DF572
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1822487552391041258
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1822493441085112722
- noteId - 1822493441085112722
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - A6BB5D887B470284DD2170F3149BA29EE8870F751AE9F243A8ABFD82E74DF572
- createdAtMillis - 1723351271303
- tweetId - 1822487552391041258
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Sincerity comes from a place of true intention and is not predicated on a quid pro quo arrangement. A sincere apology would have included deleting the original tweet, not requiring Mr. Smith to delete his post first. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sincerity
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-08-11 00:45:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-11 03:38:23 -0500 | Rating Details |