Birdwatch Note
2024-08-10 16:57:00 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
Notes is not for flagging 'harmful content' it's for reporting wrong facts. Disputing the survey results or methodology is worthy of a note.
Written by 2660D73D07D372F43F70B9EE4A455F512E3AD141D8CB65FE5BC81427B91C67E9
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1820926024525238620
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1822316229614592340
- noteId - 1822316229614592340
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 2660D73D07D372F43F70B9EE4A455F512E3AD141D8CB65FE5BC81427B91C67E9
- createdAtMillis - 1723309020796
- tweetId - 1820926024525238620
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- Notes is not for flagging 'harmful content' it's for reporting wrong facts. Disputing the survey results or methodology is worthy of a note.
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2024-08-18 06:17:00 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-15 03:59:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-17 03:18:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-14 07:49:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-10 15:14:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-09-03 10:22:17 -0500 | Rating Details |