Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-08-10 16:57:00 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

Notes is not for flagging 'harmful content' it's for reporting wrong facts. Disputing the survey results or methodology is worthy of a note.

Written by 2660D73D07D372F43F70B9EE4A455F512E3AD141D8CB65FE5BC81427B91C67E9
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1820926024525238620

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1822316229614592340
  • noteId - 1822316229614592340
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 2660D73D07D372F43F70B9EE4A455F512E3AD141D8CB65FE5BC81427B91C67E9
  • createdAtMillis - 1723309020796
  • tweetId - 1820926024525238620
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 1
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • Notes is not for flagging 'harmful content' it's for reporting wrong facts. Disputing the survey results or methodology is worthy of a note.

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-08-18 06:17:00 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-15 03:59:45 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-17 03:18:04 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-14 07:49:41 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-10 15:14:32 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-03 10:22:17 -0500 Rating Details