Birdwatch Note
2024-08-10 03:41:30 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
No note is needed. The post is primarily a political statement and is neither intended nor likely to be taken literally. Even if taken literally, the claim is not without merit. See ‘Challenges’ at https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Captive_breeding
Written by 9F525553A8CC49BE57EBC6495E8117338203C0BBF53C6D9FB6BFBCFFC9C2A115
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1822057770776195238
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1822116034104488224
- noteId - 1822116034104488224
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 9F525553A8CC49BE57EBC6495E8117338203C0BBF53C6D9FB6BFBCFFC9C2A115
- createdAtMillis - 1723261290466
- tweetId - 1822057770776195238
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- No note is needed. The post is primarily a political statement and is neither intended nor likely to be taken literally. Even if taken literally, the claim is not without merit. See ‘Challenges’ at https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Captive_breeding
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-08-10 15:03:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-10 06:41:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-09 23:12:45 -0500 | Rating Details |