Birdwatch Note
2024-08-09 13:17:53 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
Proposed CNs are linked to the referred post, rather than to the one comparing the photos.
Written by 5F74F510698365A71EFEF5B700F458773231FC42E81B90FB6021F7989A8D80AF
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1821592970757349764
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1821898698743324988
- noteId - 1821898698743324988
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 5F74F510698365A71EFEF5B700F458773231FC42E81B90FB6021F7989A8D80AF
- createdAtMillis - 1723209473679
- tweetId - 1821592970757349764
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- Proposed CNs are linked to the referred post, rather than to the one comparing the photos.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-08-10 07:03:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-09 15:01:13 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-09 10:39:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-09 10:31:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-09 09:01:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-09 08:51:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-09 08:44:32 -0500 | Rating Details |