Birdwatch Note
2024-08-07 14:02:48 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
The note provided should have been a comment explaining how others can do this, instead of critiquing it through CN
Written by 852726EBCDD927E282986A9300DF9A5DB472D6CDAFB53ACB14DE947F54CD99D8
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1821072011143344486
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1821185227206578350
- noteId - 1821185227206578350
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 852726EBCDD927E282986A9300DF9A5DB472D6CDAFB53ACB14DE947F54CD99D8
- createdAtMillis - 1723039368808
- tweetId - 1821072011143344486
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- The note provided should have been a comment explaining how others can do this, instead of critiquing it through CN
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-08-08 13:47:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-08 05:17:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-07 18:27:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-08 05:53:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-08 01:14:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-07 15:07:18 -0500 | Rating Details |