Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-08-07 01:52:28 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The suggested note is not correct. Cambridge Analytica, while controversial, was a data collection firm. Neither Cambridge nor the Trump campaign did not pay influencers to post on social media on their behalf as the suggested note claims. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/04/us/politics/cambridge-analytica-scandal-fallout.html

Written by D6832FDBC4E98C02595ECEA02516D9A5FB5008F7117DED5398D413FAFD1C9CAC
Participant Details

All Information

• ID - 1821001429806461113
• noteId - 1821001429806461113
• participantId -
• noteAuthorParticipantId - D6832FDBC4E98C02595ECEA02516D9A5FB5008F7117DED5398D413FAFD1C9CAC
• createdAtMillis - 1722995548092
• tweetId - 1820976763381674090
• classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
• believable -
• harmful -
• validationDifficulty -
• misleadingOther - 0
• misleadingFactualError - 1
• misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
• misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
• misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
• misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
• misleadingSatire - 0
• notMisleadingOther - 0
• notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
• notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
• notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
• notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
• trustworthySources - 1
• summary
• The suggested note is not correct. Cambridge Analytica, while controversial, was a data collection firm. Neither Cambridge nor the Trump campaign did not pay influencers to post on social media on their behalf as the suggested note claims. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/04/us/politics/cambridge-analytica-scandal-fallout.html