Birdwatch Note
2024-08-06 23:51:20 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN Theoretically there could be a case under antitrust law if he can proof collusion between enough firms. So far everything could be added as context inside comments
Written by 9272CB8AF1726AAEC74FC2AFBD68B178787E49CA282CF2368B53190F027056C9
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1820839633023840572
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1820970946557002082
- noteId - 1820970946557002082
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 9272CB8AF1726AAEC74FC2AFBD68B178787E49CA282CF2368B53190F027056C9
- createdAtMillis - 1722988280318
- tweetId - 1820839633023840572
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN Theoretically there could be a case under antitrust law if he can proof collusion between enough firms. So far everything could be added as context inside comments
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-08-07 04:18:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-07 00:38:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-06 19:08:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-06 18:55:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-07 06:21:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-06 19:30:15 -0500 | Rating Details |