Birdwatch Note
2024-08-01 16:50:06 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN. OP is not saying anything about her chromosomes, but is instead stating a factually correct claim about her genitals.
Written by FF4BB93FDFB72ADDF500FFA290E802EAD1BCEC95B242BAF978EA0063A3E4A280
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1819026359798157427
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1819053002906644808
- noteId - 1819053002906644808
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - FF4BB93FDFB72ADDF500FFA290E802EAD1BCEC95B242BAF978EA0063A3E4A280
- createdAtMillis - 1722531006920
- tweetId - 1819026359798157427
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- NNN. OP is not saying anything about her chromosomes, but is instead stating a factually correct claim about her genitals.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-08-02 06:55:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-02 05:12:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-02 05:07:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-01 18:23:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-01 12:30:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-01 12:17:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-01 12:03:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-02 10:37:30 -0500 | Rating Details |