Birdwatch Note
2024-08-01 03:13:14 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
Ça n’exclut pas le faite que la cristalline soit meilleur au yeux de la personne qui a fait ce tweet. Notes inutile
Written by 63AF5A2A05B26572338C7D49A74F5CEB14F36D8E1F857BC98668FEACC8F10996
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1818003306758709737
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1818847429954769295
- noteId - 1818847429954769295
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 63AF5A2A05B26572338C7D49A74F5CEB14F36D8E1F857BC98668FEACC8F10996
- createdAtMillis - 1722481994509
- tweetId - 1818003306758709737
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 1
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- Ça n’exclut pas le faite que la cristalline soit meilleur au yeux de la personne qui a fait ce tweet. Notes inutile
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-08-07 05:39:44 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-01 17:22:05 -0500 | Rating Details |