Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-07-31 03:29:36 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

The OP is making an opinion based post. No claims of fact are made, only a speculative notion of personal opinion. There should be no need for corrections.

Written by 74F8CBE92210530CA3A2A253AB468989B8FED2E627F60B35675649F84974020C
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1818436715951833144

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1818489161181012323
  • noteId - 1818489161181012323
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 74F8CBE92210530CA3A2A253AB468989B8FED2E627F60B35675649F84974020C
  • createdAtMillis - 1722396576577
  • tweetId - 1818436715951833144
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 1
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • The OP is making an opinion based post. No claims of fact are made, only a speculative notion of personal opinion. There should be no need for corrections.

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-08-04 14:04:36 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-01 10:50:05 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-31 14:40:06 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-31 12:16:45 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-31 06:29:13 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-31 00:33:41 -0500 Rating Details