Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-07-30 22:13:43 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN. OP expresses their understanding of the Bloomberg reports. Keep arguments about poll quality or Bloombergs bias to the comments as normal people would do

Written by 36FAB75B4F1E94A8B2B7F77F1850A20ACAFA7DA31641B58344818FB76A211444
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1818393207463690271

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1818409667279684066
  • noteId - 1818409667279684066
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 36FAB75B4F1E94A8B2B7F77F1850A20ACAFA7DA31641B58344818FB76A211444
  • createdAtMillis - 1722377623757
  • tweetId - 1818393207463690271
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • NNN. OP expresses their understanding of the Bloomberg reports. Keep arguments about poll quality or Bloombergs bias to the comments as normal people would do

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-07-31 08:50:12 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-31 05:24:55 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-31 04:52:34 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-31 00:32:16 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-30 23:55:32 -0500 Rating Details