Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-07-30 21:11:16 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

Note needed. Community notes, while typically to dispel misinformation, should also be used as “warning labels“ for certain tweets that could get readers into trouble without context.

Written by AAAAB22D2B2621817F3150A5E6256B1760095A19A3610A422AE0F400E64E54C7
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1818043828336517282

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1818393952027914534
  • noteId - 1818393952027914534
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - AAAAB22D2B2621817F3150A5E6256B1760095A19A3610A422AE0F400E64E54C7
  • createdAtMillis - 1722373876947
  • tweetId - 1818043828336517282
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 1
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • Note needed. Community notes, while typically to dispel misinformation, should also be used as “warning labels“ for certain tweets that could get readers into trouble without context.

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-08-11 08:06:56 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-31 09:41:53 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-31 01:12:32 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-31 00:30:13 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-18 04:54:27 -0500 Rating Details