Birdwatch Note
2024-07-29 16:54:44 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
The Court of Appeal has ruled that breaking a car window to save a child can constitute a defence to criminal damage. Thus, evidence of this would be admissible: para 45 of https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/attorney-generals-reference-no-1-of-2023/ Protest is not a defence to non-trivial criminal damage, so evidence of this isn't admissible. https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/attorney-generals-reference-no-1-of-2022/
Written by 1E82138B7F52A478E1D39B6D8E03E481D7DC99F630E38E575762CDDCB25A11D7
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1817900023046185381
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1817967002725539869
- noteId - 1817967002725539869
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 1E82138B7F52A478E1D39B6D8E03E481D7DC99F630E38E575762CDDCB25A11D7
- createdAtMillis - 1722272084301
- tweetId - 1817900023046185381
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The Court of Appeal has ruled that breaking a car window to save a child can constitute a defence to criminal damage. Thus, evidence of this would be admissible: para 45 of https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/attorney-generals-reference-no-1-of-2023/ Protest is not a defence to non-trivial criminal damage, so evidence of this isn't admissible. https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/attorney-generals-reference-no-1-of-2022/
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-08-04 17:07:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-04 14:03:44 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-04 10:13:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-04 10:01:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-04 08:08:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-04 08:06:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-02 22:16:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-07-31 10:38:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-04 14:25:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-04 09:58:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-04 08:24:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-11 03:46:54 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-17 13:52:45 -0600 | Rating Details |