Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-07-28 14:13:53 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN. Stop abusing CN to push your propaganda. Take it to the replies. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion

Written by 333F2A15EE8E7EEE8BFABEB7EBFC750AF2D1602083C1F4E15FCF10DAF4CEDB2F
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1817535051040485425

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1817564136487682132
  • noteId - 1817564136487682132
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 333F2A15EE8E7EEE8BFABEB7EBFC750AF2D1602083C1F4E15FCF10DAF4CEDB2F
  • createdAtMillis - 1722176033504
  • tweetId - 1817535051040485425
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • NNN. Stop abusing CN to push your propaganda. Take it to the replies. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-08-07 17:32:42 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-04 20:01:43 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-04 19:35:44 -0500 Rating Details