Birdwatch Note
2024-07-13 22:07:07 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
As of 13/07/24 the study referenced in the attached article has not been independently peer reviewed https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.03.23.586441v1.full
Written by FF1E67680A1EA721E46E07BEDA4F7BF82745546C64CF750158F9895C47012578
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1811833355903860745
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1812247410837758379
- noteId - 1812247410837758379
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - FF1E67680A1EA721E46E07BEDA4F7BF82745546C64CF750158F9895C47012578
- createdAtMillis - 1720908427332
- tweetId - 1811833355903860745
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- As of 13/07/24 the study referenced in the attached article has not been independently peer reviewed https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.03.23.586441v1.full
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-07-13 17:42:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-01 09:34:39 -0500 | Rating Details |