Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-07-04 16:34:42 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Pencils have been supplied at previous general elections, they are used because they don’t run out as quick as ink and do not smudge to avoid potentially ruining the paper on a legitimate vote. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/07/04/why-vote-pencil-electoral-commission-explains-pens-wet-ink/

Written by F8C59EEFC061AD50A5ED6C196E85402434A31234115D9C55516FF91A5D9DD972
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1808842338669617628

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1808902267010945037
  • noteId - 1808902267010945037
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - F8C59EEFC061AD50A5ED6C196E85402434A31234115D9C55516FF91A5D9DD972
  • createdAtMillis - 1720110882890
  • tweetId - 1808842338669617628
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Pencils have been supplied at previous general elections, they are used because they don’t run out as quick as ink and do not smudge to avoid potentially ruining the paper on a legitimate vote. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/07/04/why-vote-pencil-electoral-commission-explains-pens-wet-ink/

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2024-07-04 16:34:42 UTC
(1720110882890)
2024-07-04 21:57:38 UTC
(1720130258616)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2024-07-14 02:45:42 UTC
(1720925142742)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2024-07-04 21:57:38 UTC
(1720130258616)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-07-07 04:49:56 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-07 04:26:31 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-05 06:40:02 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-05 01:34:41 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-05 00:18:04 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-04 20:45:49 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-04 18:46:37 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-04 18:25:37 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-04 17:18:43 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-04 17:08:55 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-04 16:43:22 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-04 16:41:52 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-04 15:43:23 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-04 15:30:02 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-04 14:29:24 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-04 14:28:47 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-04 14:16:52 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-04 14:09:35 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-04 13:55:44 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-04 13:21:29 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-04 13:17:46 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-04 12:47:04 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-04 12:44:12 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-04 12:34:02 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-04 12:30:31 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-04 12:28:55 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-04 12:23:55 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-04 12:14:24 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-04 12:07:32 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-04 12:06:00 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-04 12:04:18 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-04 11:53:48 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-04 11:49:33 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-04 11:47:40 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-04 11:46:59 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-04 11:42:02 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-04 11:37:59 -0500 Rating Details