Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-07-01 19:30:54 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

“Because these courts categorically rejected any form of Presidential Immunity, they did not analyze the conduct alleged in the indictment to decide which of it should be categorized as official and which unofficial.” -Page 24 of the ruling https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf

Written by 8EB4A6242B2E58D33A2F857702D8FCED434CD3B7C0E428C874A97B01554ED164
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1807803513843376337

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1807859445961314422
  • noteId - 1807859445961314422
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 8EB4A6242B2E58D33A2F857702D8FCED434CD3B7C0E428C874A97B01554ED164
  • createdAtMillis - 1719862254978
  • tweetId - 1807803513843376337
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • “Because these courts categorically rejected any form of Presidential Immunity, they did not analyze the conduct alleged in the indictment to decide which of it should be categorized as official and which unofficial.” -Page 24 of the ruling https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2024-07-01 19:30:54 UTC
(1719862254978)
2024-07-02 19:12:11 UTC
(1719947531203)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2024-07-14 02:45:42 UTC
(1720925142742)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 2024-07-02 19:12:11 UTC
(1719947531203)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-07-02 14:12:03 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-02 02:34:06 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-01 21:58:06 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-01 21:02:52 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-01 20:05:44 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-01 19:56:04 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-01 18:57:34 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-01 18:53:41 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-01 18:08:34 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-01 17:07:51 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-01 16:29:44 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-01 16:26:39 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-01 16:09:29 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-01 16:00:45 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-01 15:49:47 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-01 15:35:29 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-01 15:30:33 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-01 15:28:42 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-01 15:27:39 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-01 14:59:13 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-01 14:52:58 -0500 Rating Details