Birdwatch Note
2024-06-16 00:05:38 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
La réduction des émissions de S02 n'est PAS responsable de 80% du réchauffement climatique. Mais l'augmentation du forçage radiatif induit participe désormais pour 80% du forçage radiatif. Cela pourrait accélérer le réchauffement, mais n'en est pas là cause (le CO2 en est une) https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-024-01442-3
Written by 215F3DD7D26FD48C493AD816BAAF6BE6BD20FC1D0712E0F2FE2AF074CA7E27C2
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1802067807405805961
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1802130378137739549
- noteId - 1802130378137739549
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 215F3DD7D26FD48C493AD816BAAF6BE6BD20FC1D0712E0F2FE2AF074CA7E27C2
- createdAtMillis - 1718496338768
- tweetId - 1802067807405805961
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- La réduction des émissions de S02 n'est PAS responsable de 80% du réchauffement climatique. Mais l'augmentation du forçage radiatif induit participe désormais pour 80% du forçage radiatif. Cela pourrait accélérer le réchauffement, mais n'en est pas là cause (le CO2 en est une) https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-024-01442-3
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2024-06-16 00:05:38 UTC (1718496338768) |
2024-06-16 16:49:19 UTC (1718556559430) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL | 2024-06-17 02:11:39 UTC (1718590299183) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 2024-06-16 16:49:19 UTC (1718556559430) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2024-06-16 12:55:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-06-16 09:45:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-06-16 09:44:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-06-16 09:33:00 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-06-16 03:10:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-06-16 02:17:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-06-16 01:30:56 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-06-16 00:46:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-06-15 23:02:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-06-15 19:12:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-06-17 13:17:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-06-17 02:39:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-06-16 10:04:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-06-16 01:34:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-06-21 08:09:19 -0500 | Rating Details |