Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-05-14 05:59:28 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

No evidence to suggest WP has been used against terrorists has been presented. The sole basis for this claim is a statement by TRF, a front for Lashkar-e-Toiba, whose cadre were neutralized in the op. WP is not banned but regulated under limited use clause in int'l law. https://disarmament.unoda.org/the-convention-on-certain-conventional-weapons/

Written by 203A0A016BC4E4120EB1E928374C8C139687A3CD38280FBFF147CFDAAACC8EEF
Participant Details

All Information

• ID - 1790260620585205853
• noteId - 1790260620585205853
• participantId -
• noteAuthorParticipantId - 203A0A016BC4E4120EB1E928374C8C139687A3CD38280FBFF147CFDAAACC8EEF
• createdAtMillis - 1715666368039
• tweetId - 1790043077442232418
• classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
• believable -
• harmful -
• validationDifficulty -
• misleadingOther - 0
• misleadingFactualError - 0
• misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
• misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
• misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
• misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
• misleadingSatire - 0
• notMisleadingOther - 0
• notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
• notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
• notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
• notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
• trustworthySources - 1
• summary
• No evidence to suggest WP has been used against terrorists has been presented. The sole basis for this claim is a statement by TRF, a front for Lashkar-e-Toiba, whose cadre were neutralized in the op. WP is not banned but regulated under limited use clause in int'l law. https://disarmament.unoda.org/the-convention-on-certain-conventional-weapons/