Birdwatch Note
2024-02-26 13:48:21 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Das Paper Hamre et al. ist nicht methodisch sauber oder unbiased. Die Arbeit verzerrt durch mehrfachen Einschluss bestimmter Studien & das cherrypicken von 6 vermeintlich positiven MAs (sowie das falsche wiedergeben der Aussagen der Autoren dieser) Ergebnisse. https://netzwerk-homoeopathie.info/im-datennebel-ein-neuer-review-zur-homoeopathie/
Written by B9D0A92F4EA5971B3EE60D1957304D7210566DF22CEB20C1E30DADD0316087A8
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1762014757635199097
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1762112368757067822
- noteId - 1762112368757067822
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - B9D0A92F4EA5971B3EE60D1957304D7210566DF22CEB20C1E30DADD0316087A8 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1708955301832
- tweetId - 1762014757635199097
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Das Paper Hamre et al. ist nicht methodisch sauber oder unbiased. Die Arbeit verzerrt durch mehrfachen Einschluss bestimmter Studien & das cherrypicken von 6 vermeintlich positiven MAs (sowie das falsche wiedergeben der Aussagen der Autoren dieser) Ergebnisse. https://netzwerk-homoeopathie.info/im-datennebel-ein-neuer-review-zur-homoeopathie/
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2024-02-26 13:48:21 UTC (1708955301832) |
2024-02-26 20:42:37 UTC (1708980157756) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL | 2024-02-27 07:06:10 UTC (1709017570610) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL | 2024-02-26 20:42:37 UTC (1708980157756) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-02-26 16:37:57 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-26 11:39:14 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-26 10:29:17 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-26 08:29:17 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-27 03:59:48 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-27 02:43:43 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-27 00:27:14 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-27 00:01:41 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-26 15:42:02 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-26 11:54:24 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-26 11:43:36 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-26 11:38:34 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-26 08:50:07 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-26 08:14:41 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-27 03:59:18 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-26 15:43:22 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-26 11:56:41 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-26 07:55:37 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-26 07:52:07 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-27 02:09:25 -0600 | Rating Details |