Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-26 17:43:36 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2797A5D0CD8DB62DD7235FD5708EF44A5EF78C13FC6E4B1E2F8A55C498F0A73F
Participant Details

Original Note:

Das Paper Hamre et al. ist nicht methodisch sauber oder unbiased. Die Arbeit verzerrt durch mehrfachen Einschluss bestimmter Studien & das cherrypicken von 6 vermeintlich positiven MAs (sowie das falsche wiedergeben der Aussagen der Autoren dieser) Ergebnisse. https://netzwerk-homoeopathie.info/im-datennebel-ein-neuer-review-zur-homoeopathie/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1762112368757067822
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2797A5D0CD8DB62DD7235FD5708EF44A5EF78C13FC6E4B1E2F8A55C498F0A73F
  • createdAtMillis - 1708969416566
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17621123687570678222797A5D0CD8DB62DD7235FD5708EF44A5EF78C13FC6E4B1E2F8A55C498F0A73F