Birdwatch Note
2023-08-16 12:43:39 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
L'affirmation dans le tweet est incorrecte. L'étude en question ne mentionne pas l'utilisation d'eau par les scientifiques pour tester les protections menstruelles. L'étude se concentre sur les différentes méthodes de protection en termes d'absorption en utilisant du sang. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37550075/
Written by DDDEA4907B3A3222F0928D16D3CA6A01283C416DA761213DE3807D5AAD561A6B
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1691444537309175808
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1691792840022458680
- noteId - 1691792840022458680
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - DDDEA4907B3A3222F0928D16D3CA6A01283C416DA761213DE3807D5AAD561A6B Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1692189819708
- tweetId - 1691444537309175808
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- L'affirmation dans le tweet est incorrecte. L'étude en question ne mentionne pas l'utilisation d'eau par les scientifiques pour tester les protections menstruelles. L'étude se concentre sur les différentes méthodes de protection en termes d'absorption en utilisant du sang. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37550075/
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-08-16 12:43:39 UTC (1692189819708) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-08-17 02:13:06 UTC (1692238386519) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-08-16 16:59:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-16 16:47:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-16 15:51:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-16 15:43:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-16 13:13:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-16 12:22:00 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-16 10:55:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-16 09:03:44 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-16 08:24:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-17 14:24:15 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-17 12:30:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-17 05:45:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-17 02:07:44 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-19 18:28:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-18 13:56:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-20 14:40:19 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-20 08:41:31 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-16 17:01:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-16 11:12:09 -0500 | Rating Details |