Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-08-16 12:43:39 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

L'affirmation dans le tweet est incorrecte. L'étude en question ne mentionne pas l'utilisation d'eau par les scientifiques pour tester les protections menstruelles. L'étude se concentre sur les différentes méthodes de protection en termes d'absorption en utilisant du sang. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37550075/

Written by DDDEA4907B3A3222F0928D16D3CA6A01283C416DA761213DE3807D5AAD561A6B
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1691444537309175808

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1691792840022458680
  • noteId - 1691792840022458680
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - DDDEA4907B3A3222F0928D16D3CA6A01283C416DA761213DE3807D5AAD561A6B Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1692189819708
  • tweetId - 1691444537309175808
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • L'affirmation dans le tweet est incorrecte. L'étude en question ne mentionne pas l'utilisation d'eau par les scientifiques pour tester les protections menstruelles. L'étude se concentre sur les différentes méthodes de protection en termes d'absorption en utilisant du sang. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37550075/

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-08-16 12:43:39 UTC
(1692189819708)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-08-17 02:13:06 UTC
(1692238386519)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-08-16 16:59:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-16 16:47:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-16 15:51:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-16 15:43:24 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-16 13:13:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-16 12:22:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-16 10:55:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-16 09:03:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-16 08:24:41 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-17 14:24:15 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-17 12:30:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-17 05:45:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-17 02:07:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-19 18:28:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-18 13:56:50 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-20 14:40:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-20 08:41:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-16 17:01:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-16 11:12:09 -0500 Rating Details