Birdwatch Note
2023-07-02 06:14:31 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
The LNP Baird government started this process in 2016: https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/historic-sydney-harbour-island-to-be-restored-handed-back-to-indigenous-landowners-20220528-p5ap8d.html This has been in progress for several years. It was not an election issue as it was already in motion, by the then government (now opposition). It has bi-partisan support.
Written by F5F5E7C0DA8DDB2A7DF8A2897AF37C6E70F54D86DC20C5D31BDB52582315655E
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1675038432974995456
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1675387455820935169
- noteId - 1675387455820935169
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - F5F5E7C0DA8DDB2A7DF8A2897AF37C6E70F54D86DC20C5D31BDB52582315655E Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1688278471321
- tweetId - 1675038432974995456
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The LNP Baird government started this process in 2016: https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/historic-sydney-harbour-island-to-be-restored-handed-back-to-indigenous-landowners-20220528-p5ap8d.html This has been in progress for several years. It was not an election issue as it was already in motion, by the then government (now opposition). It has bi-partisan support.
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-07-02 06:14:31 UTC (1688278471321) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-07-03 02:10:07 UTC (1688350207262) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-07-02 18:25:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-02 09:38:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-02 08:59:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-02 08:57:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-02 08:46:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-02 08:13:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-02 07:59:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-02 06:15:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-02 06:05:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-02 02:21:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-02 01:45:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-03 08:25:30 -0500 | Rating Details |