Birdwatch Note
2023-03-14 09:42:28 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
There are decades of research demonstrating that earthquake predictions perform no better than background probabilities. https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/can-you-predict-earthquakes https://pnsn.org/outreach/faq/earthquake-prediction https://scienceexchange.caltech.edu/topics/earthquakes/earthquakes-probabilities https://sitn.hms.harvard.edu/flash/2019/predicting-next-big-earthquake/ https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-00685-y https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/ssa/srl/article/89/2A/577/525827/Do-Large-Magnitude-8-Global-Earthquakes-Occur-on https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/can-position-moon-or-planets-affect-seismicity-are-there-more-earthquakes-morningin-eveningat Seismologists have posted results, data, and code testing these claims specifically and found they do not surpass background probabilities: https://twitter.com/bwcphd/status/1633897308499902464 https://twitter.com/PierreSeismo/status/1634593771731189760
Written by 7E8DD68BF742E1F4F003D272944E35B694C57075F3C02192EFAFC2E7FBEDB021
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1635560643066576899
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1635577123267280897
- noteId - 1635577123267280897
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 7E8DD68BF742E1F4F003D272944E35B694C57075F3C02192EFAFC2E7FBEDB021 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1678786948398
- tweetId - 1635560643066576899
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- There are decades of research demonstrating that earthquake predictions perform no better than background probabilities. https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/can-you-predict-earthquakes https://pnsn.org/outreach/faq/earthquake-prediction https://scienceexchange.caltech.edu/topics/earthquakes/earthquakes-probabilities https://sitn.hms.harvard.edu/flash/2019/predicting-next-big-earthquake/ https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-00685-y https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/ssa/srl/article/89/2A/577/525827/Do-Large-Magnitude-8-Global-Earthquakes-Occur-on https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/can-position-moon-or-planets-affect-seismicity-are-there-more-earthquakes-morningin-eveningat Seismologists have posted results, data, and code testing these claims specifically and found they do not surpass background probabilities: https://twitter.com/bwcphd/status/1633897308499902464 https://twitter.com/PierreSeismo/status/1634593771731189760
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-03-14 09:42:28 UTC (1678786948398) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-03-15 05:09:59 UTC (1678856999448) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-03-14 13:50:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-14 13:28:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-14 13:13:19 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-14 12:18:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-14 12:14:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-14 12:11:38 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-14 11:42:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-14 11:21:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-14 10:45:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-14 10:05:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-14 09:35:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-14 08:27:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-14 08:18:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-14 08:06:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-14 07:41:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-14 06:14:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-14 05:14:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-14 04:51:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-15 16:41:15 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-20 03:14:22 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-14 05:14:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-14 13:28:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-14 11:21:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-14 07:41:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-14 08:27:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-14 12:14:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-14 13:50:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-14 08:06:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-14 09:35:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-14 08:18:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-14 12:18:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-14 10:05:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-14 10:45:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-14 04:51:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-14 12:11:38 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-14 11:42:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-20 03:14:22 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-14 06:14:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-14 13:13:19 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-15 16:41:15 -0500 | Rating Details |