Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-03-11 18:33:17 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

Tweet argues that men, in general, should not be able to adopt. Their opinion is that two men would pose double the risk to the child just because they are men…not because they are gay. Suggested note not needed, misses key point. https://twitter.com/woman4w/status/1633846345441366016?s=46&t=37QrNKqiKlTt_ZaD3s1m8Q https://twitter.com/woman4w/status/1633835277348401158?s=46&t=37QrNKqiKlTt_ZaD3s1m8Q https://twitter.com/woman4w/status/1633889011382009869?s=46&t=37QrNKqiKlTt_ZaD3s1m8Q

Written by 72A59FB5955991E68C6349DA62C35A734500BE2AEFDA828D7BB704AB0E76465C
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1633776265843859457

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1634623542708031488
  • noteId - 1634623542708031488
  • participantId - 72A59FB5955991E68C6349DA62C35A734500BE2AEFDA828D7BB704AB0E76465C
  • noteAuthorParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1678559597076
  • tweetId - 1633776265843859457
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Tweet argues that men, in general, should not be able to adopt. Their opinion is that two men would pose double the risk to the child just because they are men…not because they are gay. Suggested note not needed, misses key point. https://twitter.com/woman4w/status/1633846345441366016?s=46&t=37QrNKqiKlTt_ZaD3s1m8Q https://twitter.com/woman4w/status/1633835277348401158?s=46&t=37QrNKqiKlTt_ZaD3s1m8Q https://twitter.com/woman4w/status/1633889011382009869?s=46&t=37QrNKqiKlTt_ZaD3s1m8Q

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-03-11 18:33:17 UTC
(1678559597076)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-03-13 02:08:35 UTC
(1678673315039)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-03-11 12:37:42 -0600 194E657ACC3C5A7882B68F36F22447305592AE9A89D72778CFBF7686B0456B63 Rating Details
2023-03-11 13:41:16 -0600 2140483F585067CF2EA42E83AD82217125E6118BFDA70416C35A4A3930968C2C Rating Details
2023-03-11 12:59:05 -0600 45060ED935D102E05C21C743FE433C0B17B27D8FCF69CED01A2AD3F9AB2815B1 Rating Details
2023-03-11 16:15:28 -0600 8DFEA1DCD4EE6F2E9E68EDCFD3E2882AC52E6C70497E30E5E6E234DAA7DF6DE7 Rating Details
2023-03-11 16:15:40 -0600 E87EE2844723AF6921C9CB9520F13968D825D7359E96FB395389414B7368A681 Rating Details
2023-03-11 13:41:16 -0600 Rating Details
2023-03-11 12:37:42 -0600 Rating Details
2023-03-11 12:59:05 -0600 Rating Details
2023-03-11 16:15:28 -0600 Rating Details
2023-03-11 16:15:40 -0600 Rating Details