Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-03-09 18:34:49 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

This tweet is expressing personal opinion. And rushing to defend Elon Musk only reinforces that opinion's validity. 'Community Notes are not meant for quick dunks, personal opinions, or insults.' Disagreement/Debate should be in the replies. https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/values.html

Written by 49E68D0F137FBAADC316EEA761B671D21AE8B4A83C0804FF39800AB057A7583E
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1623003366191247373

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1633899155675574272
  • noteId - 1633899155675574272
  • participantId - 49E68D0F137FBAADC316EEA761B671D21AE8B4A83C0804FF39800AB057A7583E
  • noteAuthorParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1678386889748
  • tweetId - 1623003366191247373
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • This tweet is expressing personal opinion. And rushing to defend Elon Musk only reinforces that opinion's validity. 'Community Notes are not meant for quick dunks, personal opinions, or insults.' Disagreement/Debate should be in the replies. https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/values.html

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-03-09 18:34:49 UTC
(1678386889748)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-03-09 23:11:13 UTC
(1678403473309)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-03-10 17:36:51 -0600 2F1E148E62276FF995A4480A9B87C1F2CAAFC522D4E432927F446677D1ACD5FE Rating Details
2023-03-09 14:03:21 -0600 45060ED935D102E05C21C743FE433C0B17B27D8FCF69CED01A2AD3F9AB2815B1 Rating Details
2023-03-09 13:07:47 -0600 71A8D089BB7143D7CFA04A0D7EEF5C32B3B2901386875FDE172BA7A711F2ADB9 Rating Details
2023-03-09 13:36:50 -0600 72A59FB5955991E68C6349DA62C35A734500BE2AEFDA828D7BB704AB0E76465C Rating Details
2023-03-09 12:41:08 -0600 B5FEE1C7F02671E2466AE0184315222BE9F827034DA0D608839BE86F8B7D554A Rating Details
2023-03-09 14:14:49 -0600 C378931E048482D2BFDF00DC95644D6377CBCB812C79FF87D77B5E48595B3DA3 Rating Details
2023-03-09 15:24:51 -0600 FF4D14ECB44DF49A1B7C50B81F8713E48DEA0FFAE6D09353483A100132988F62 Rating Details
2023-03-09 13:07:47 -0600 Rating Details
2023-03-09 12:41:08 -0600 Rating Details
2023-03-09 14:14:49 -0600 Rating Details
2023-03-09 14:03:21 -0600 Rating Details
2023-03-10 17:36:51 -0600 Rating Details
2023-03-09 15:24:51 -0600 Rating Details
2023-03-09 13:36:50 -0600 Rating Details