Birdwatch Note
2023-03-07 16:49:37 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
There is no scientific basis for earthquake prediction. Earthquakes are always possible in areas with active faults, but specific forecasts perform no better than random when tested. The "predicted" areas here are some of the world's most seismically active regions. https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/can-you-predict-earthquakes https://scienceexchange.caltech.edu/topics/earthquakes/earthquakes-probabilities https://pnsn.org/outreach/faq/earthquake-prediction https://sitn.hms.harvard.edu/flash/2019/predicting-next-big-earthquake/ https://www.vice.com/en/article/kz4jyz/earthquake-conspiracy-theorists-are-wreaking-havoc-during-emergencies https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/can-you-predict-an-earthquake/
Written by 114D3959B7A1FAF013A9773725D3AC9653F490590C8B76CB7CE232B010DE900E
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1633049393984311296
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1633147904973213700
- noteId - 1633147904973213700
- participantId - 114D3959B7A1FAF013A9773725D3AC9653F490590C8B76CB7CE232B010DE900E
- noteAuthorParticipantId -
- createdAtMillis - 1678207777623
- tweetId - 1633049393984311296
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- There is no scientific basis for earthquake prediction. Earthquakes are always possible in areas with active faults, but specific forecasts perform no better than random when tested. The "predicted" areas here are some of the world's most seismically active regions. https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/can-you-predict-earthquakes https://scienceexchange.caltech.edu/topics/earthquakes/earthquakes-probabilities https://pnsn.org/outreach/faq/earthquake-prediction https://sitn.hms.harvard.edu/flash/2019/predicting-next-big-earthquake/ https://www.vice.com/en/article/kz4jyz/earthquake-conspiracy-theorists-are-wreaking-havoc-during-emergencies https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/can-you-predict-an-earthquake/
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-03-07 16:49:37 UTC (1678207777623) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-03-09 02:09:52 UTC (1678327792328) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-03-07 12:54:40 -0600 | 45060ED935D102E05C21C743FE433C0B17B27D8FCF69CED01A2AD3F9AB2815B1 | Rating Details |
| 2023-03-07 13:38:45 -0600 | 9736DF42171A999208E640D9616E3AF1D2219C9694E38F806D374F891F58485E | Rating Details |
| 2023-03-07 11:58:47 -0600 | ADA7A6B861E84F16A9AC3EE64215DB07837986FF7A1CF25A4D643148B37B51E4 | Rating Details |
| 2023-03-07 11:38:44 -0600 | BCE1617AB1CAE8A24B7EB5E79E218EE63C01A69D41005CA0CD4D289DD3A5A9F8 | Rating Details |
| 2023-03-13 11:26:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-20 00:43:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-07 11:58:47 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-13 11:26:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-07 13:38:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-07 12:54:40 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-20 00:43:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-07 11:38:44 -0600 | Rating Details |