Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-03-07 00:16:11 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

There is no scientific basis for earthquake prediction; claims of predictive utility from atmospheric phenomena have been disproven. There is always a chance for quakes in areas with active faults, but specific forecasts perform no better than random when tested. https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/can-you-predict-earthquakes https://pnsn.org/outreach/faq/earthquake-prediction https://scienceexchange.caltech.edu/topics/earthquakes/earthquakes-probabilities https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/do-solar-flares-or-magnetic-storms-space-weather-cause-earthquakes https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/there-earthquake-weather https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/are-earthquakes-associated-variations-geomagnetic-field https://www.npr.org/2023/02/07/1154893886/earthquake-prediction-turkey-usgs

Written by 7981A2C40D6150AF302C8AD7A987AA43203E1B7AD414C9BDAD30EB7DC45672CB
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1632327976447619072

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1632897898340810759
  • noteId - 1632897898340810759
  • participantId - 7981A2C40D6150AF302C8AD7A987AA43203E1B7AD414C9BDAD30EB7DC45672CB
  • noteAuthorParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1678148171397
  • tweetId - 1632327976447619072
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • There is no scientific basis for earthquake prediction; claims of predictive utility from atmospheric phenomena have been disproven. There is always a chance for quakes in areas with active faults, but specific forecasts perform no better than random when tested. https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/can-you-predict-earthquakes https://pnsn.org/outreach/faq/earthquake-prediction https://scienceexchange.caltech.edu/topics/earthquakes/earthquakes-probabilities https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/do-solar-flares-or-magnetic-storms-space-weather-cause-earthquakes https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/there-earthquake-weather https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/are-earthquakes-associated-variations-geomagnetic-field https://www.npr.org/2023/02/07/1154893886/earthquake-prediction-turkey-usgs

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-03-07 00:16:11 UTC
(1678148171397)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-03-07 02:11:29 UTC
(1678155089929)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-03-06 18:36:49 -0600 114D3959B7A1FAF013A9773725D3AC9653F490590C8B76CB7CE232B010DE900E Rating Details
2023-03-06 19:52:06 -0600 94D6F49DC83AD218D6D405C9224306ADA3B6AE0FF56571D96CB7C9E4156C9208 Rating Details
2023-03-06 21:55:33 -0600 C378931E048482D2BFDF00DC95644D6377CBCB812C79FF87D77B5E48595B3DA3 Rating Details
2023-03-06 18:29:02 -0600 EF37E84E90611D2C09E0C4783A129C16AF3F47946953BBDC410C1EBA376C23D5 Rating Details
2023-03-20 00:29:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-17 06:07:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-06 21:55:33 -0600 Rating Details
2023-05-17 06:07:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-06 18:36:49 -0600 Rating Details
2023-03-20 00:29:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-06 18:29:02 -0600 Rating Details
2023-03-06 19:52:06 -0600 Rating Details